Yushu’s Week 7 Discussion

I resonate with the New York Times’ article regarding the potential dangers of misinformation fueled by new AI developments like DALLE-3. Recently, I’ve observed a surge in the use of DALLE-3 or mid-journey products for news imagery. This trend is apparent on various social media platforms and forums I frequent, making it increasingly challenging to […]

Continue reading →

Fady’s Education Debate Report

Maybe the abyss was already there Last Wednesday, two groups from my class debated the following question: Will ChatGPT and other similarly powerful AI tools have positive or negative impacts on higher education? Certainly, the debate on artificial intelligence’s role in higher education is a pressing one. It is, after all, one big elephant in […]

Continue reading →

Louisa’s First Debate Report

The first debate centers on whether ChatGPT and other AI tools have positive or negative impacts on higher education. Having listened to the entire discussion, my personal view is that while we might perceive certain negative impacts on higher education, ChatGPT and other AI tools’ positive influences will become evident over time, and we should […]

Continue reading →

Week 6 Study Guide

Hello everyone, Firstly, a big round of applause to both teams for their commendable efforts in the debate! The depth and sophistication of the discussions were enlightening, and I personally also gained many new insights from your exchanges and performances. Thank you! The debate was a great commencement to the latter half of our course. […]

Continue reading →

LLMs’ Evaluative Strategies Summarized from Group Discussions (Weeks 3 to 5)

– Introduction of knowledge:          For analysis;         For utilization;         Outside of domain – “Chain-of-thought” reasoning – Counterfactuals/hypotheticals – Recursive phrasing – Constraints/lists – Adjusting prompt phrasing to test the result – Ethical scenarios – Language – Cherry-picking – Logic – Translation – Summarization – Training the model to ignore irrelevant deviations (e.g. typo) – Prompts pp. […]

Continue reading →

Debate Rules and Debate Reports for Perspectives on LLMs

Objective of the Debate The primary objective of the debate is to foster open discussion and collaborative thinking, rather than focusing on competition or a win-lose outcome. While participants will adopt and defend particular positions, the ultimate goal is to explore and comprehend the rationale behind differing reasoning and perspectives.   Focus on Clarity, Not […]

Continue reading →