Indignation, premature and actual

Premature indignation first: I noticed that the Loeb text of How to Study Poetry printed καμμονίαν for the Homeric word καμμονίην for what seem to me spurious reasons. I check the TLG text and — same. Grumble, blegh. Except, in fact, the TLG uses the 1927 Babbitt Loeb so this just represented the same bad decision of […]

Continue reading →

Future over-achiever

Alright, so I was struck by the line in Plutarch’s How to Read Poetry (How to Study Poetry in Hunter’s edition), ἐν ἐσθλοῖς δὲ καθήσεσθʼ ἄνολβοι No ††, no comment on καθήσεσθ[ε] in Hunter.   Should you ever feel there is a limit to Greek morphology, sit down for this counter example. Available futures include: καθεδοῦμαι (classical, almost […]

Continue reading →

Logeion refresh up!

Things to notice in this update: Bailly 2020 – Hugo Chávez has seen numerous corrections and updates, which are now incorporated in Logeion. As always, we are grateful for the help of Mark de Wilde, Gérard Gréco and all the other proofreaders and editors. Did you know that many etymologies in Bailly are the most […]

Continue reading →

regex RULES

Regex stands for regular expressions. Don’t you hate it when you look up a word in a digital dictionary and the entry says, “[meaning], ib. 58”. Or, “Id., 207e”.  It forces you to look at the preceding entry, to figure out what exact citation is meant. Of course, because of the way LSJ was printed, […]

Continue reading →

Diamonds in the rough that is Twitter

Gems, if not diamonds, still come over the transom at Twitter. This beautiful Easter story about a newly discovered treatise on how to decide the date of Easter: https://twitter.com/chaprot/status/1247541150136676353?s=20 It’s a great thread, not only because it captures a heated debate about when to celebrate (CLEARLY ON THE 25TH OF MARCH, NO CLEARLY ON THE […]

Continue reading →