Category Archives: Uncategorized

Friday, October 19: Joanne Vera Stolk (University of Oslo)

On Friday, October 19, at 11:30am in Harper 141, LVC will be holding a joint meeting with the Morphology & Syntax workshop (please note the special time and place!). Joanne Vera Stolk (University of Oslo) will be presenting on non-standard spelling and morphology in Greek. Please find the abstract below:

Hearing Greek, writing Coptic? Explaining non-standard spelling and morphology in a historical language contact situation
Egyptian monks living in monasteries of Western Thebes during the seventh century CE left behind a substantial corpus of liturgical hymns written in Greek, containing a considerable amount of non-standard orthography and morphology. This provides us with an interesting corpus for linguistic study of the cognitive processes involved in the production of spelling and morphology by non-native writers. I apply an interactive dual-route model for spelling in order to explain how these non-standard forms could have been generated. By analyzing these innovative forms we can get more information about the scribe’s orthographic lexicon and their knowledge and use of orthographic and morphological patterns in their first and second language.

Friday, January 26th: Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee

This Friday, January 26th, LVC will host a talk by Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations. We will meet at the usual time, 3:30 pm in Rosenwald 301. Information about her talk is below. Hope you can make it!

“Dative or no dative: The function of the morpheme -iš in Akkadian and other Semitic languages”

Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (UChicago)

An issue that has long been debated in the reconstruction of Semitic languages is the original function of a morpheme suffixed to nouns that can be reconstructed as *-is to Proto Semitic.

This morpheme primarily functions as directional marker indicating the connotation ‘to, toward’ and to mark adverbs. It is further important to note that the morpheme *–is, or at least its consonantal segment /s/, is commonly assumed to underlie the dative pronouns, both independent pronouns and pronominal suffixes, that are attested in several Semitic languages.The fact that the directional or, as it is commonly called, “terminative” morpheme *–is and the marker of the dative in pronouns /s/ clearly seem to be related has led scholars to the conclusion that the morpheme *-is should be considered an original case, more specifically, an original dative case.

The idea that *–is represents a case marker, however, has also been challenged. Alternatively, it has been suggested that *-is represents an adverbial marker, not a case. In this talk, I will consider arguments in favor and against the interpretation of *-is as case or adverbial marker. Methodologically, the talk will draw from Historical Linguistics, Typology, and comparative evidence in order to determine criteria that can help us determine whether we are dealing with a suffixial or clitic morpheme in the case of Semitic *-is.

LVC on Friday Jan 15 CANCELLED

Unfortunately LVC has to announce that this weeks talk by Hans Boas has been cancelled due to family emergency. We know you were excited, but there are still plenty of upcoming LVC talks to look forward to, including a talk by Rajend Mesthrie next week! Check out the schedule below for the events scheduled in January.

LVC Schedule for January 2016

Happy New Year! LVC is pleased to announce the following talks and workshops for the Month of January. All events will be held on Fridays from 3:00-4:30 in Rosenwald 301, unless otherwise noted!

January 15th: Hans Boas (The University of Texas at Austin) Title: TBA

January 20th: Rajend Mesthrie (University of Cape Town) Title: TBA         IMPORTANT: This is scheduled for Wednesday January 20th, not the regular Friday meeting time. More information forthcoming.

January 29th: ELAN workshop featuring Jordan Fenlon & Jon Keane (University of Chicago)

Updates on presentation topics and future events will be posted later in the quarter!

Ross Burkholder @ LVC & LCC on Friday, November 13th

Friday, November 13th @ 3:00 PM in Rosenwald 301

Language use in MOBA Gaming Communities

Ross Burkholder
University of Chicago

In this talk I discuss a recent project investigating language use in Multiplayer Online Battle Arena (MOBA) games, focusing in particular on language use in the community surrounding the game DOTA 2. During the course of this talk I hope to describe, compare, and highlight specific areas of language use in MOBAs.

Describe: What kind of language is being used in-game?
– How do variables effect individuals language use?
– How has language use changed over time?

Compare: How does the register used in MOBA games compare to…
– Other MOBAs?
– Other online gaming communities?
– Other computer mediated language?

Highlight: How does the multilingual nature of the community effect language use?
– What strategies are used when no mutual language is available?
– How are responses to multilingualism framed and formed?

In order to answer these questions, this study makes use of a small (but growing) corpus of game replay files, looking at various frequencies, concordances, and collocations. As this project is in the beginning phases, there will be more emphasis during the talk on the formulation of research questions, and the methodologies used in order to answer them, than on the presentation of results. Discussion of all aspects of this project is strongly encouraged.


Complementary indexicalities: gaze, pointing, and conversational scaffolding in an emerging sign language


In this workshop presentation, I will introduce “Z” (Zinacantec Family Homesign), an emerging first generation sign language from a Tzotzil (Mayan) speaking community in Chiapas, Mexico, and the ways I have tried to study it over the past seven years or so. I will concentrate on the structure of attention in Z conversation and the foundational importance of two general formal devices for managing mutual attention: pointing and gaze. Adapting somewhat Du Bois’ aphorism (1985) that “grammars code best what speaker do most” I will sketch very briefly some of my own previous work on the grammaticalization of attention in Z, turning, as time permits, to evidence in the signing and socialization of the first (and perhaps only) second generation signer of standards of well-formedness and the formal regimentation of mutual attention as central to the emergence of this new language.



LVC schedule for spring 2015

Hello everyone! For the Spring 2015 quarter, LVC is pleased to announce the following talks. Please be attentive to start times and rooms.

Friday, April 17th: Asia Pietraszko (Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago); joint presentation with the Workshop on Language, Cognition, and Computation
“The morphology of compound tenses in Ndebele”

Friday, May 8th: Professor Jerrold Sadock (Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago)
“West Yiddish: The Extinct Ethnolect of German Jews”

Tuesday, June 2nd: Katie Franich (Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago)
11am: Wieboldt 130
“Finding the Beat in a Tone Language”

Friday, June 5th: Professor John Haviland (Department of Linguistics, UC San Diego); joint presentation with the Semiotics Workshop
1:30pm: Social Sciences 122
“Complementary indexicalities: gaze, pointing, and conversational scaffolding in an emerging sign language”

Monday, June 8th: Professor Petra Goedegebuure (Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations & the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago)
3:30pm: Rosenwald 432
“The rise of split ergativity (or rather split accusativity) in Hittite”

Tuesday, June 9th: Adam Singerman (Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago)
12pm: Rosenwald 011

Professor Cristoph Harbsmeier (University of Oslo) at LVC on Thursday, March 12th!

“Strategies of Literacy among the Dungan of Central Asia”
Professor Cristoph Harbsmeier

Thursday, March 12th, @ 4PM in Social Sciences 401.

Christoph Harbsmeier

Discussions about literacy tend to be about the difference literacy makes to cultures.

The present talk is about the crucial difference it makes not only what kind of alphabetic or syllabic writing system is adopted, but especially what general type of writing system (Chinese-type morphemic versus purely phonetic) is chosen. I shall discuss the cultural politics and the linguistic impact of such choices between writing systems in the history of the Dungan language in Kyrgyzstan.

Throughout most of the twentieth century research on Dungan has been predominantly in Russian, the language with which Central Asian Dungan has always been in a close symbiotic relationship. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union Chinese linguists have paid sharply increasing attention to Dungan linguistics.

Both the Russian and the Chinese linguistic scholarship will be shown to have had significant political motivations.

The choice among the writing systems will be shown to be closely linked to strategies of ethnic self-construal among the Dungan people in Central Asia.

The University of Oslo hosts a fairly comprehensive public database on Dungan affaors designed by Ivo Spira:

Here it will be seen that Dungan printed literature is extensive. Much of it is now conveniently available on-line.

Ivo Spira has organised an important conference on Dungan Studies in September 2014:

Dr. Pia Lane @ LVC on Friday, March 6th!

Dr. Pia Lane (University of Oslo)
Minority language standardisation – methodological approaches

Pia Lane

I will investigate the standardisation of Kven, a Finnic minority language spoken in Northern Norway. Kven got recognised as a language in 2005. Influenced by the global focus on language revitalisation and the new status of Sámi and minority languages in neighbouring countries, many Kven wish to reclaim their language, and currently, a written standard is being developed.

Developing a standard for a minority language is not a neutral process; this has consequences for the status of the language and how the language users relate to the new standard. An inherent problem with standardisation is whether the users themselves will accept and identify with the standard chosen. Standardisation changes the conditions and scope for human agency, and therefore, social actors are key factors when standardising minority languages. I will use an ethnographic approach to address how minority language users relate to standardisation processes (Lane 2014), focussing on the role of social actors (Scollon and Scollon 2004). For this presentation, I will draw on and compare different types of data such as sociolinguistic interviews, discussions in social media, reactions of Kven speakers when reading Kven for the first time and participant observation as a member of the Kven Language Council.

Language standardisation usually has material outcomes such as texts resulting from the standardisation process (text books, grammars and dictionaries), and also linguistic forms included in in the standard. Such objects may be seen as results of actions that have been performed at some point in time by an individual (Norris 2007). By applying the concept of frozen action to language standardisation, language standards are analysed as mediated actions, a result of social actions performed in the past. Accordingly, a nexus analysis of social practices shows how language users embrace, accept and contest discourses of revitalisation and language standardisation to varying degrees and for a wide range of reasons.

Lane, Pia 2014. Minority language standardisation and the role of users. Language Policy 10.1007/s10993-014-9342-y
Norris, Sigrid.2004. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. New York: Routledge.
Scollon, Ron and Suzie Wong Scollon 2004. Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.