Journals Dedicated to the Digital Humanities:

Digital Humanities Quarterly
DSH: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Digital Studies
Journal of Digital Humanities

Chicago Colloquium on Digital Humanities and Computer Science

2015 Website and Schedule: https://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/dhcs/

Monographs:

De Bolla, Peter. The Architecture of Concepts
Gitelman, Lisa. Paper Knowledge
Debates in the Digital Humanities. Ed. Matthew Gold (2012)
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Think
Jockers, Matthew. Macroanalysis (2013)
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading.
Pasanek, Brad. Metaphors of the Mind.
Ramsay, Stephen. Reading Machines.
Underwood Ted. Why Literary Periods Mattered
Tufte, Edward. Beautiful Evidence.

Journal Articles:

Drucker, Johanna. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly. 2011.5.1

Elson, D. K., N. Dames, and K. R. McKeown. “Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction.” Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. 138-147.

Goldstone, Andrew and Underwood, Ted. “What can topic models of PMLA tell us about the history of literary scholarship?” (2012)

Houston, Natalie. “Towards a Computational Analysis of Victorian Poetics.” Victorian Studies 56.3 (Spring 2014): 498-510.

Kirschenbaum, Matthew, and Werner, Sarah. Digital Scholarship and Digital Studies: The State of the Discipline 406-458 (2014)

Liu, Alan. “The Meaning of the Digital Humanities” (2014)

Nowviskie, Bethany. “Speculative Computing: Instruments for Interpretive Scholarship.” Ph.D dissertation, University of Virginia, 2004.

O’Connor, Brendan, David Bamman, and Noah Smith, “Computational Text Analysis for Social Science: Model Assumptions and Complexity,” NIPS Workshop on Computational Social Science, December 2011.

Piper, Andrew. “Novel Devotions: Conversional Reading, Computational Modeling, and the Modern Novel.” New Literary History 46.1 (2015).

Representations (Special forum on “Search” in the Summer 2014 issue)

Sculley, D., and Bradley M. Pasanek. “Meaning and Mining: The Impact of Implicit Assumptions in Data Mining for the Humanities.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 23.4 (2008): 409-24.

Shmueli, Galit. “To Explain or to Predict?” Statistical Science 25.3 (2010).

So, Richard Jean, and Hoyt Long, “Network Analysis and the Sociology of Modernism,” boundary 2 40.2 (2013).

Stallybrass, Peter. “Against Thinking.” PMLA 122.5 (2007): 1580-1587.

Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlets

Underwood, Ted. “Theorizing Research Practices We Forgot to Theorize Thirty Years Ago” (2014)

Wilkens, Matthew. “Digital Humanities and Its Application in the Study of Literature and Culture,” Comparative Literature 67:1 (2015)

Williams, Jeffrey. “The New Modesty in Literary Criticism.” Chronicle of Higher Education.January 5, 2015.

Yarowsky, David. 1992. Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget’s categories trained on large corpora. In COLING 92,

–– 1995. Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivalling supervised methods. In ACL 95, pages 189–196, MIT