Current Advisees (ABD) | Richard B. Miller

Richard B. Miller

Laura Spelman Rockefeller Professor of Religion, Politics, and Ethics

Current Advisees (ABD)

Miriam Attia

Miriam Attia earned her BA from Stanford in Philosophy and Religious Studies and her MA from GTU in Jewish Studies. Her training covers Christian and Jewish ethics, bioethics, theologies of suffering, conceptions of religious identity, understandings of divine providence, academic writing, ethnographic methods, and inclusive pedagogy. She is researching authority structures in religious institutions, religious gender norms, responses to suffering, just-world beliefs, and how members of traditional religious communities express and receive constructive feedback.

For her dissertation, “Whosoever Resists: Religious Authority, Creative Protest, and Productive Response,” she is conducting ethnographic research with three Chicago congregations, some of whose members are respectfully challenging certain doctrines and policies. Her dissertation examines how religious organizations can maintain stability and identity and provide meaning without delegitimizing challenges from subordinate or marginalized members. Email: mattia@uchicago.edu.

Ranana Dine

Ranana Dine is a scholar of religious ethics and Jewish studies who works on Jewish and medical ethics with a particular focus on how visual culture impacts the moral life. Her dissertation is entitled “A Jewish Visual Ethics of Death and Dying” and focuses on how a visual approach to the dead body and to memory of loved ones can inform our understandings of obligations to the dead. She argues that first a visual approach to religious ethics broadly, and Jewish ethics in particular, can help us understand better the moral lives of religious practitioners. She then asks what this approach can teach us about the robust moral obligations Jews have to the dead – to their bodies and to their memory. Using theorists including Emmanuel Levinas and Avishai Margalit, and artworks from across the Ashkenazi world, she argues that our obligations to the dead are based in our relationships of care for the living, and that this understanding has implications for bioethics. She holds a BA in religion and art from Williams College, and received her MPhil from the University of Cambridge in theology and medical humanities. 

Zachary Taylor

Zachary Taylor is a scholar of religion, ethics, and theology whose research focuses on the ethics of collective memory and the broader relationship between religion and forms of memory. His dissertation, An Augustinian Ethic of Collective Memory, explores whether and on what basis Christians can justify collective memorial duties in the political sphere. His dissertation defends two, interrelated theses: first, he claims that Augustine supplies moral and theological concepts to justify collective memorial duties indexed to the particular histories of secular political communities. Second, he contends that the scriptural and Eucharistic rituals of Christian liturgy are “rituals of remembrance” that form Christians to be capable of “just remembrance” in political life. His other interests include religious and theological ethics, Roman Catholic moral theology, the philosophy of religion, and the relationship between religion and politics. He earned a B.A. in Classics and Philosophy from Washington and Lee University and an M.Phil. in Theology, Religion, and Philosophy of Religion from the University of Cambridge.

Colin Weaver

Colin Weaver received his B.A. from St. Olaf College and M.A. from the University of Chicago Divinity School. His research and teaching interests include religion and environmental ethics, the ethics of difference, and Anglo-American philosophy of religion. Mr. Weaver’s dissertation, “Religious and Cultural Difference and Environmental Morality,” critically and constructively engages environmental philosophers, scholars of religion, and post-humanists on the question, How should we relate to people with vastly different conceptualizations of nonhuman nature from our own? He suggests that an adequate response must involve an answer to a prior question: How should we conceive of the moral lives that others share with the nonhuman? Drawing on ordinary language philosophy, Mr. Weaver develops an answer to the latter question, which illuminates overlooked responses to the former. Mr. Weaver’s project is being co-advised by Professor Fredericks and myself. Email: cbweaver@uchicago.edu.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email