Schedule

Upcoming Events


Check back soon!


~2015 – 2016 Events~


Navigating Normativity: Pedagogical Challenges and Opportunities of Diverse Commitments in the Classroom
Craft of Teaching  & the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop)

Wednesday, June 1

4:30 – 6:30 PM
Location: Swift 106

It has become a truism that there is no neutral position from which course material may be examined, either on the part of students or of teachers. Not exclusively but certainly not least in religious studies, students and teachers alike enter a class with held positions of some kind toward the objects of inquiry. Particularly when the material at hand is disturbing or provocative (e.g. the Crusades; demonic possession), ethically uncompromising (e.g. animal rights activism; the Left Behind novels), or under contemporary public scrutiny (e.g. race relations; religiously motivated violence), being able to monitor and respond to the range of attitudes brought to bear by participants in the classroom is essential to ensuring learning. However, just how to relate to these commitments and to what extent address them explicitly can trouble even veteran teachers.This workshop is intended to cultivate sensitivity and strategy in relation to the commitments of students and teachers, which come together in an inevitable but variable mixture specific to each classroom setting. Teaching effectively to and not only about diversity is a challenge that we will embrace. There will not be one solution but rather a palette of possibilities with which teachers may choose to proceed in light of their pedagogical contexts and goals.Our panel represents three different fields in three different institutional settings:

Prof. Laurie Zoloth (Northwestern University) is Professor of Religious Studies, Professor of Bioethics and Medical Humanities at the Feinberg School of Medicine, and Director of Graduate Studies at Northwestern University’s Department of Religious Studies. She is co-chair of the American Academy of Religion’s Section on women and Religion and a member of the Society for Scriptural Reasoning, and she has been a member of the NASA National Advisory Council.

Prof. Jonathan Ebel (U of I Urbana-Champaign) is Director of Graduate Studies and Associate Professor, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Religion. His research program involves religion and war, religion and violence, lay theologies of economic hardship all within the American context. He is a graduate of the University of Chicago Divinity School (PhD, 2004).

Prof. Valerie Johnson (DePaul University) is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at DePaul University. Her research focuses on urban politics, African-American politics, and urban education.

See more at: https://divinity.uchicago.edu/60116-navigating-normativity-pedagogical-challenges-and-opportunities-diverse-commitments-classroom#sthash.9B3uv6Fr.dpuf


Symposium on Heidegger’s Confessions
Thursday, May 26, 4:30pm
Swift Hall, 3rd Floor Lecture Hall
Ryan Coyne (University of Chicago)

Jean-Luc Marion (University of Chicago)
Gregory Fried (Suffolk University)
*Cosponsored by the Lumen Christi Institute the Philosophy of Religions Workshop and the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop

Although Martin Heidegger is nearly as notorious as Friedrich Nietzsche for embracing the death of God, the philosopher himself acknowledged that Christianity accompanied him at every stage of his career. In Heidegger’s Confessions, Ryan Coyne isolates a crucially important player in this story: Saint Augustine. Uncovering the significance of Saint Augustine in Heidegger’s philosophy, he details the complex and conflicted ways in which Heidegger paradoxically sought to define himself against the Christian tradition while at the same time making use of its resources.

More Information.


“Sacramental Existence and Embodied Theology in Buber’s Representation of Hasidism”
– Sam Berrin Shonkoff, PhD Candidate in History of Judaism
Thursday, May 5

5:00 – 6:20 PM
Swift 208
*Co-sponsored with the Jewish Studies Workshop

Paper Abstract:

Martin Buber denied consistently that he was a theologian because he repudiated abstract discourse about God. However, he did affirm that intersubjective events in the world express theological truth, even if that truth cannot be possessed or professed thereafter as noetic content. In this paper I introduce a concept of “embodied theology” to elucidate this nuance in Buber’s religious thought, and I show how his Ḥasidic writings shed unique light on these matters. Through hermeneutical investigations of his Ḥasidic tales vis-à-vis the original sources, I illuminate Buber’s conviction that genuine sages convey theological meaning through the very spiritual-corporeal dynamics of their lives—or what Buber calls their “sacramental existence.”

Joshua A. Connor, PhD Candidate in Religious Ethics, will offer a response


“Poetics of The Flesh”
-Mayra Rivera, Associate Professor of Theology and Latina/o Studies, Harvard Divinity School
Thursday, May 5
3:00 – 4:00 PM
Swift 403

Professor Rivera will be discussing her most recent book, Poetics of the Flesh (Duke 2015), which explores the connections between theological, philosophical, and political metaphors of body and flesh.


“Healing through Prayer or Transforming Social Systems?:
The Importance of Emphasis in a Both-And Approach”
An Intellectual Debate with Elena Lloyd-Sidle and Mark Lambert (PhD Students in Theology)

Thursday, April 28
5:00 – 6:20 PM
Swift 208

Elena and Mark will be discussing the merits of prayer and individual healing on the one hand, and healing through transformation of social systems, on the other. Elena’s dissertation research is on the conceptual interplay of the two, and how they might be understood to be co-constitutive. Elena will begin by giving a synopsis of Ellen Armour’s recent review of the first volume of Sarah Coakley’s systematic theology, which Armour puts into conversation with a work by Elisabeth Schussler-Fiorenza (Journal of Religion, January 2016). This specific and current discussion of the possible perils of emphasizing the spiritual over the systemic will give us an entrance into the broader discussion.


“Philosophical archeology and deconstruction. Towards an archeology of the subject”
Alain de Libéra, Professor of the History of Medieval Philosophy at the Collège de France

With responses by Jean-Luc Marion and Ryan Coyne.
Tuesday, April 26, 4:30-6:20
Location: Swift Lecture Hall

*Cosponsored with the Medieval Studies Workshop


“Will and nil: Christ’s agony in the garden and other ethical dilemma’s in early Christian and medieval thought.”
Alain de Libéra, Professor of the History of Medieval Philosophy at the Collège de France

Tuesday, April 19, 4:30-6:20
Location: Swift Common Room

*Cosponsored with the Medieval Studies Workshop


The Folly of God: A Theology of the Unconditional: A Conversation with John D. Caputo
Thursday, April 14
Time: 2:30 – 3:50 PM
Location: Swift Hall Common Room

Inspired by Paul Tillich’s suggestion that atheism is not the end of theology but is instead the beginning, and working this together with Derrida’s idea of the undeconstructible, Caputo explores the idea that the real interest of theology is not God, especially not God as supreme being, but the unconditional. The Folly of God continues the radical reading of Paul’s explosive language in 1 Corinthians about the stand God makes with the nothings and nobodies of the world first introduced in The Weakness of God (2006) and The Insistence of God (2013).

John D. Caputo, is the Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Humanities Emeritus at Syracuse University and the David R. Cook Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Villanova University. Caputo specializes in continental philosophy of religion, working on approaches to religion and theology in the light of contemporary phenomenology, hermeneutics and deconstruction, and also the presence in continental philosophy of radical religious and theological motifs. He is known especially for his notions of radical hermeneutics and the weakness of God.


Sin as Self-Sabotage: Saint Augustine on Ravishing One’s Own Ruin
Thursday, April 14, 7:00pm

Location TBA

David Meconi, S.J. (St. Louis University)

Cosponsored by the Lumen Christi Institute and the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop

When St. Augustine innocuously yet infamously stole some pears in his youth, he confessed that he did it simply because he was in love with his own ruin.  Have you ever looked at your sins as the way you destroy that which you do not like about yourself?  Fr. Meconi’s talk will draw from this Augustinian insight that sin is really a form of self-sabotage, a way of keeping

More Information.


Sacred Violence: The Legacy of René Girard
Thursday, April 7, 4:30pm
Swift Hall, 3rd Floor Lecture Hall

James B. Murphy (Dartmouth College)
William Cavanaugh (DePaul University)
Jean-Luc Marion (University of Chicago)
 
*Cosponsored with the Lumen Christi Institute, the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop, and the John U. Nef Committee on Social ThoughtRené Girard (1923-2015) has been described as the Darwin of the human sciences for his theories of the origin of violence and religion and the imitative character of human behavior (mimesis). His books, among them Violence and the Sacred and Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World, span the fields of Literary Criticism, Psychology, Anthropology, Sociology, History, Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology. While his theories have attracted many devoted disciples, Girard has also sparked controversy for his sweeping general claims, tendentious readings of canonical works, and his explicitly Christian perspective. This panel discussion will consider the significance of Girard’s thought for the human sciences.
 
More Information.

Dylan Belton – “Animals as Means and Ends: Taking the Teleological-Chain of Being Seriously” 

Friday, March 11
2:00 – 3:20 PM
Swift 208

Co-Sponsored with the Animal Studies Workshop

Abstract:
A certain narrative has become prominent within the field of human-animal ethics, namely, that the vision of reality as a teleological-chain of being is simply a non-option for us in the 21st century as we try to urgently reformulate how it is that we ought to relate to non-human animals. This essay is the beginning of an attempt to push back against this narrative, which, while not without merit, is in the end misguided. As the title hints at, our stance towards non-human animals seems to be caught in a curious “in-between” state: on the one hand, we have little choice but to use non-human animals (and other organisms) and therefore treat them as means toward human ends. On the other hand, the aversion that many feel towards, for instance, the indifferent treatment of animals in factory farms reveals that we in some way see non-human animals as beings who have genuine, intrinsic teloi, the superfluous or indifferent thwarting of which is a wrong. Any viable human-animal ethical theory has to account for this situation and offer a means for us to properly navigate the dynamic between treating other animals as both means and ends. It is my contention in this essay that the teleological-chain of being in its Christian guise is able to do just this. It offers not only a coherent and realistic account of how we are to practically relate to other animals within a wider ecological context but also offers an ontological vision that is able to ground this practical relation. The two figures whose principles are used to make this case are Augustine and Aquinas, both of whom are often accused of promoting dangerously anthropocentric accounts of human-animal relations. I conclude by showing both how the denial of this position leads to serious difficulties and how the teleological-chain of being can perhaps solve some pressing issues in the field of human-animal ethics, most important of which is the need to account for why it is that the existence of a vast multiplicity of species is a good that ought to be preserved. Concerning this latter issue, I show the strength of the perspective outlined in the paper over those of Peter Singer’s Utilitarianism and Martha Nussbaums’ Capabilities Approach to human animal ethics.


Richard Hoskins, “Reinhold Niebuhr and the Role of Ethics in the Study of International Politics”
Thursday, February 18
5:00 – 6:20 PM
Swift 208
 
Richard Hoskins is a Ph.D. student at the Divinity School. He has a B.A. from the University of Kansas in political science and a J.D. from Northwestern University Law School, where he is a Senior Lecturer.  He is also a partner in the Chicago law firm of Schiff Hardin LLP and a former Justice Department attorney, specifically Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Criminal Division.  He has taught at the University of Virginia Law School and lectured at Yale and UCLALaw Schools and has published a number of articles in law journals. Paper Description:
“My paper and presentation draw on my dissertation, based in theological ethics and international relations theory.  It is an analysis of Reinhold Niebuhr’s theological, ethical, and political writings regarding relations among nation-states and U.S. foreign policy.  I argue that the natural trajectory of Niebuhr’s thought (“Christian Realism”) when applied to international theory places him within what, in IR study, is called the English School of International Relations theory, one of four major schools.  The English School is, in most ways, the successor to classical realism which was pioneered by Niebuhr and Hans Morgenthau and was the predominant school of IR theory from approximately the publication of Moral Man and Immoral Society in 1932 until soon after Niebuhr’s death in 1971.  At about that time, American IR was converted from a humanistic, historical, and ethical study of international politics into a value-free social science on the model of economics.  This came to be called “neorealism” or “structural realism,” in part to distinguish it from what then came to be called “classical realism.”   Significantly, neorealism abandoned ethical inquiry as a serious component of IR study, marking a sharp departure from classical realism.  It also set aside the role of human nature, which was of particular concern to Niebuhr and others in classical realism.Thus, I focus on the role of ethical reasoning and judgment in international politics and argue for its continued importance.  More specifically, I am concerned with (a) the role that Niebuhr assigned to ethical judgment in international politics; (b) how Niebuhr’s notions of moral judgment in IR arose from his Christian and Biblical theology, as well as the significance of the fact that this was and is not shared by other classical realists (much less neorealists); and (c) why the English School, while different from Christian Realism, is its logical ally in understanding international political developments.”

Discussion with Prof. Hopkins – Teaching Global Theologies: Power and Praxis
Tuesday, February 16

12:00-1:15pm PM
Swift 208

Join the Theology and Religious Studies Workshop and Global Christianities Tuesday, February 16, from 12:00-1:15pm in Swift 208 for a discussion with Professor Dwight Hopkins. We will be discussing the book he recently co-edited, Teaching Global Theologies: Power and Praxis. Hyein Park and Hector Varela-Rios will respond and facilitate the discussion.Lunch will be provided!The introduction to the book may be downloaded ahead of time here. (It’s only 7 pages and we think it will be helpful background for the conversation.)


 Dissertations and Spirits with Andrew DeCort
Wednesday, February 3
5:00 – 6:20 PM
Swift 406

Bonhoeffer’s Beginning: Universal Entry, “the Problem of Morality,” and the Ethics of New Beginning This dissertation investigates the ethics of making new beginnings after devastation and moral rupture in the thought of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A full introduction can be downloaded ahead of time here.Join us as we discuss DeCort’s project and hear about his own experience going through the dissertation process.


Aquinas: Poet and Contemplative
Thursday, January 28, 7:00pm
Swift Hall Common Room, 1025 E. 58th St.

Paul Murray, O.P. (Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome)REGISTER HERECo-sponsored with the Lumen Christi Institute and the Medieval Studies Workshop“The well-known is what we have yet to learn.” T.S. EliotWhat do we know of the prayer-life of St Thomas Aquinas? This lecture will be directly concerned with this question, and the answer may well come as a surprise to many people. Aquinas is still today almost exclusively regarded as an outstanding scholastic philosopher and theologian. But what is little known is that he was also a master of the spiritual life and a very considerable poet, perhaps even the greatest Latin poet of the Middle Ages.


“History and Comparison in the Study of Religious Ethics”
with Professor David Clairmont, University of Notre Dame
Thursday, January 21
12:15 – 1:20 PM
Swift 106

The Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop and the Medieval Studies Workshop invite you to a joint session on Thursday, January 21st – 12:00 – 1:20 PM at Swift 208 – Lunch will be provided!

Professor David Clairmont (Tisch Family Associate Professor of Theology and Director of Master of Theological Studies Program at the University of Notre Dame) will be presenting on “History and Comparison in the Study of Religious Ethics (with additional thoughts on the challenges of writing and publishing in the field!)”. See the abstract below.

Abstract

In the genre of informal intellectual autobiography, this presentation will offer an account of the places negotiated for historical and comparative studies in religious ethics by tracing the development of one intellectual project initiated at the University of Chicago (an ecumenical divinity school with a long standing respect for the critical, comparative, academic study of religion) and completed at the University of Notre Dame (in a Roman Catholic department of theology). Among the topics examined will be (1) understanding the institutional context of the graduate student-as-scholar’s academic work, (2) thinking about intellectual continuity and scholarly audience when one’s institutional context changes with one’s first academic appointment, and (3) exploring how the elements of one’s academic formation can be either constrained or liberated, perhaps even integrated, with a change in academic environment and a guarded recognition of multiple viable academic publics. Guests are encouraged to share the genesis and transformation of their own recent academic projects, and some time will be devoted to describing the process of publishing journal articles and books.

David A.Clairmont studies comparative religious ethics, particularly the moral thought of Roman Catholicism and Theravada Buddhism, and issues of method in Catholic moral theology. He is interested in questions of moral formation, inter-cultural dialogue in the Church, and the importance of inter-religious dialogue for the future of Catholic moral theology. He is co-editor (with Don S. Browning) of American Religions and the Family: How Faith Traditions Cope with Modernization (Columbia University Press, 2007) and author of Moral Struggle and Religious Ethics: On the Person as Classic in Comparative Theological Contexts (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011). His articles have appeared in the Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics and the Journal of the American Academy of Religion. He is currently working on two books: first, an analysis of the shape and contemporary relevance of Bonaventure’s moral theology tentatively titled “Bonaventure’s Hope; and second, an introduction to comparative religious ethics” (with William Schweiker) tentatively titled “Religious Ethics: Meaning and Method.”


Academic Study of Religion and Religious Faith and Practice
Panel Discussion

Thursday, January 14
5:00-6:30 PM (new time!)
Swift Hall Room 208

What is the academic study of religion? Does it challenge religious beliefs? Is there a way to overcome the potential challenges? Do you see your work having any impact in religious communities or religious practice? How do you address audiences as different as academia, religious communities, general public, etc?

We have asked Elsa Marty, Danielle DeLano, Aslan Cohen, and Patrick Lambelet to respond to these challenging questions and explain their own approach to the topic during an open panel discussion. Please join us on Thursday Jan. 14th- 5:00-6:30 PM, Swift 208 for a friendly and rich conversation on topics that concern us all.


The Enhancing Life Project, Panel Discussion
Tuesday, December 1
4:30 – 6:00 PM
Swift Hall Common Room

On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop will hold a special session featuring The Enhancing Life Project. All are welcome to join us from 4:30 – 6:00 PM in the Common Room for a panel discussion with the Principal Investigators, Prof. Schweiker and Prof. Günter Thomas (Ruhr-University Bochum), along with Prof. Culp and Prof. Sulmasy, who are two of the thirty-five scholars selected to be part of the Project.

We will hear about the history, development and aims of Enhancing Life Project and learn about each of the scholars’ individual research projects (see titles below).

About The Enhancing Life Project
The Enhancing Life Project explores an essential aspiration of human beings that moves persons and communities into the future. Given the profound expansion of human power through technology as well as advances in genetics, ecology, and other fields, the vulnerability and endangerment as well as the enhancement of life are dominant themes in the global age. The Enhancing Life Project aims to explore this rich but widely unexamined dimension of human aspiration and social life, and increase knowledge so that life might be enriched. Learn more.

Panelists:


Application Clinic: PhD Programs in Religious Studies
Wednesday, November 18, 2015, 4:30pm: Swift 200
RSVP by Nov. 5th [Deadline Extended]

Are you applying to PhD programs in Religious Studies? Let us help you! The Philosophy of Religions Club and Workshop is teaming up with the Theology and Religious Ethics Workshop to offer an application clinic Wed. Nov 18th.  Get advice from current Div School PhD students who went through the process. Please send us a draft of your statement of purpose ahead of time and we will offer constructive feedback to help you score that offer.

DEADLINES:
RSVP to Workshop Coordinator Anil Mundra (amundra@uchicago.edu) by November 5th if you want to participate to tell us:
a) what area/departments you intend to apply for;
b) whether you are comfortable having your statement read and discussed by the whole group, or would prefer a one-on-one critique.

We will need you to send us the draft of your statement of purpose (NOT your writing sample) by November 11th so the readers have time to formulate their comments.


Divine Faith and Private Judgement in Newman and Aquinas
Thursday, November 19, 4:30PM
Classics 110, 1010 E. 59th St.
Reinhard Hütter (Duke University)

REGISTER HERE

Cosponsored with The Lumen Christi Institute


“Concept History and Religious Discourse”
Evan Kuehn, PhD Candidate in Theology
Tuesday, November 3 – 12:15 – 1:30 PM
Swift 208
Lunch will be provided

Abstract:
Since the second half of the twentieth century, the history of concepts (Begriffsgeschichte) has made important contributions to the study of political and social thought, as well as to cultural history more generally. Reinhart Koselleck is generally recognized as the founder of this approach to historical study, which focuses on “basic concepts” without which modern social and political discourse would be impossible. Koselleck has argued that during the eighteenth century, basic concept use in Europe experienced widespread trends of 1) democratization, 2) temporalization, 3) incorporation into ideologies, and 4) politicization. More recently Koselleck’s original proposals have been revisited and reinterpreted, and researchers from Finland, Brazil, England, and other countries have worked to give the project a more global linguistic scope.

This presentation will consider the possibility of a conceptual history of religious discourse. While conceptual history has thus far focused primarily on political and social concepts, some research has more recently turned to religious concepts. This work should be expanded, and can be improved by the insight of theologians and ethicists who often have a better understanding of religious concept use than conceptual historians whose main focus is political thought. I will summarize how concept history could be applied to religious concepts, and how theologians might make a contribution to the theory behind Koselleck’s understanding of modern concept use, particularly with regard to ideas about the secularization of concepts. Questions will also be raised about the extent to which the practice of theological concept history should make normative claims about religious concepts, and how national and linguistic boundaries that are traditionally in play for conceptual history should be modified in the case of religious discourse, which is often more trans-national in scope, or otherwise determined by communal boundaries that do not coincide with official political and linguistic boundaries.

Lisa Landoe Hedrick, PhD Candidate in Theology, will offer a response.


“Majestic and Macabre Mirrors: Virginity and Leprosy in the Theology of Gregory of Nyssa”
Mark Lambert
Tuesday, October 27 – 12:00 – 1:20 PM
Swift 208

Abstract: In a pair of sermons “On the Love of the Poor,” more traditionally known by the Latin equivalent, De pauperibus amandis, Gregory of Nyssa presents an impassioned plea on behalf of the plight of the poor and leprous in his native Cappadocia. These sermons not only provide insight into Gregory’s theological anthropology, but are also linked to his understanding of virginity. Through an exegesis of De pauperibus amandis in dialogue with On Virginity and The Life of Macrina, I will elucidate Gregory of Nyssa’s rendering of lepers and virgins as numinous mirrors, capable of reflecting the grace and image of God/Christ. I will further demonstrate the congruence of Gregory’s thought on virginity and leprosy as explicated in three themes: the body as a mutable membrane liable to transformation; the irresistible incandescence and aesthetic of virgins/lepers; and finally, the ability of these “mirrors” to refract tangible grace and healing.

Daniel Owings will offer a response.
Download Paper
https://uchicago.box.com/s/1eu8wofevz9ak7xe8hb3u659ilzhp0xo


Ritual, Ethics, and Geoengineering with Prof. Sarah Fredericks
Tuesday, October 20 – 12:00 – 1:20 PM
Swift 208

You are cordially invited to a special meeting of the Theology and Religious Workshop with Sarah E. Fredericks, Assistant Professor of Environmental Ethics. Prof. Fredericks joined the Divinity School faculty this year. She will be giving a lecture on a chapter that is to be published in the forthcoming volume, Calming the Storm: Theological and Ethical Perspectives on Climate Engineering (Edited by Kevin J. O’Brien and Forrest Clingerman; Rowman & Littlefield). Geoengineering is the intentional, global-scale manipulation of the climate to combat climate change. In “Ritual Responses to Geoengineering,” Fredericks discusses the existential and moral threats revealed by the fact that some people are considering climate change and the need for religious action before, during, and after its implementation. Her chapter specifically focuses on solar radiation management, the most favored type of geoengineering and also, she argues, the most ethically controversial.


“Morals or Metaphysics: The Place of Charity in Christian Thought”
Gary A. Anderson (University of Notre Dame)

Wednesday, October 7 – 7:00 PM (Swift Common Room)
Presented by the Lumen Christi Institute. Cosponsored by the Theology & Religious Ethics Workshop and the Early Christian Studies Workshop.

Abstract: When modern persons think about assistance for the poor the two major categories that tend to dominate are the motivations of the donor (altruism) and the effects of the donation (social justice). Though both of these attributes were part of classical Christian thinking, they stood on a deeper foundation: a description of the type of world God had made. And so, charity was as much about metaphysics as its was morality.
More information: http://www.lumenchristi.org/morals-metaphysics/


“Florida Water: Meaningful and Messy Hybridity in the Atlantic Modern”
Hector Varela
Tuesday, October 6 – 12:00 -1:20 pm
Swift Hall 208

Abstract: Florida Water, a perfume produced by a U.S. company for more than two centuries, has become a powerful signifier in Latin American communities. Agua Florida, as it is called in Spanish, is ubiquitous and polyvalent, used for cleaning the house, and, for some, for purifying the body and space in religious ritual. The paper explores Agua Florida’s cultural agency, inter-religious relevance, and quotidian liminality as an example of messy while meaningful hybridity.
Lunch will be provided.
Co-sponsored with Global Christianities Workshop.


Theology and Religious Ethics Workshop Meet-and-Greet
Thursday, October 1, 4:30 pm – 5:30 PM
Swift Hall – Room 201

Join us Thursday, October 1st for a casual meet-and-greet with the Ethics Club, Theology Club, and the Theology and Religious Ethics Workshop. We will discuss our schedule and plans for the year. Divinity School students interested in theology and ethics are invited to attend, learn more about the clubs and workshop and share their ideas. Light refreshments will be provided.