Do You Know How to Wear Clothes? (Or rather, a condescending treatise on presentation and propriety and accompanying commentary)
The woman who knows how to wear clothes is a stage director who skillfully presents herself (okay, so now it has to mean something? Newsflash! I’m wearing these clothes so I don’t freeze to death in this frozen hellscape. Next!). This skill in presentation is something for which it is difficult to write directions, because it is a talent rather than a formula (Talent, right. Because it definitely takes talent to convince my Cotillion director that this dress that I’m wearing totally came out of my own closet and not my girlfriend’s.) Naturally, she who is young and whose skin is clear, whose figure is model “16,” can literally put on any hat of dress she fancies and have both become her to perfection (Okay, Lady. First of all, it’s a hormonal disorder. Don’t be fucking rude. Second of all, culottes are for nobody and I will die on that hill). And yet another girl, lacking the knack of personal adjustment, will find the buying of a becoming hat an endless search through such trials of unbecomingness that she buys, not one she likes, but the one she dislikes least, because she must put something on her head (A hat? A hat?! All the clothes in the world and you choose a hat?! Why not something of substance, like a skirt? If you’re really going to keep up this politeness shtick, at least consider straying from the finery into the territory of, I don’t know, something from the day-to-day?).
The sense of what is becoming and the knack of putting clothes on well are the two greatest assets of smartness (God, I hate that word. “Becoming.” Every time it’s followed by the words “of a lady,” I just want to vomit. Because why does it matter? Why does it fucking matter? Are you just going to take away my “woman card” if I can’t wear a hat without looking like an egg? Besides, to hell with formal titles. I’m tired of being told that my worth as a woman is determined by my ability to hold dinner parties, stand in the corner, and look pretty. I’m not your doll. Not anymore.). And both are acquirable by anyone willing to look at herself as she really is (Look at myself as I am? Okay, fine. I am I. I am me. I exist. I don’t have the perfect body, but I have a body that works. I look like an absolute troll when I wake up, but at least I wake up in the first place. I curse and I cry and I make a fool of myself on the daily, but at least I get the option to do that. Many people don’t. So, if you really feel the need to tell me that the things that are “becoming” of me as a lady are floofy dresses and ugly hats, then be my guest. But if you’re going to tell people who are just trying their best to survive that they’re not doing good enough by your arbitrary standards, then you can take your “etiquette” and shove it.)
Process Notes:
The text in bold comes from the 1945 edition of Emily Post’s Etiquette. In the Cotillion program that I taught back home, this was the book from which we taught. It is 640 pages of what could be considered to be valuable information under certain circumstances, but asserts that these rules are necessary for daily life and carries a dismissive undertone, one that suggests that a person’s worth (often a woman) is determined by how well they can follow these rules. From the point at which I realized that this program was not for me, I have harbored a lot of frustration about the tone that Post takes. I guess that the text in italics represents a rather aggressive person of my thoughts upon reading this text now, a year out of the environment that the National League of Junior Cotillions creates. I wanted to interweave a statement about expectation and, to some extent, performativity into this piece, but I’m not sure that I succeeded. In truth, I’m not sure that I like this work very much, but it was an interesting challenge nonetheless.