About Us

What is Mock Trial?

Meet Our Board

What is mock trial?

Mock trial is a competition in which teams try fictional cases to a jury. Some recent case topics include murder, kidnapping, and plane crashes.

 

In any given trial, one school argues the prosecution/plaintiff side of the case and another school argues the defense. Each team presents opening statements, witness examinations, and closing arguments. Every component in a trial is scored on a scale from 1-10, and the team with the most points at the end of the trial wins. The videos on the right showcase two closing arguments (videos 1 & 3) and the beginning of a direct examination (video 2).

 

A year in mock trial is divided into three parts: the pre-stack season, the invitational season, and the competitive season. The pre-stack season happens immediately after try-outs. Every pre-stack team is made up of competitors of mixed ability and experience. After pre-stack, the program is “stacked” into four teams: an A team, a B team, and two C teams. Those teams compete at invitationals to prepare for the official competitive season. The competitive season is run by AMTA (the American Mock Trial Association), and consists of three tournaments: Regionals, Opening Round Championships (ORCs), and the National Championship Tournament (NCT).

 

You don’t have to want to be pre-law to do mock trial! Many of our most successful competitors majored in STEM subjects and never touch the law after they graduate. The skills you learn in mock trial are valuable no matter what you do after college. If you want to learn more about why you should sign up, click the “Join” tab!

 

Past Case Topics

State v. Davis

A patient of kidney specialist D.J. Davis, MD, falls off a latter at his worksite. Instead of getting up and walking it off, the patient suffers a massive brain hemorrhage and dies. Now Davis faces a charge of involuntary manslaughter for prescribing an allegedly dangerous cocktail of drugs. The State may call out Davis for his wantonness and recklessness. They may even claim he was part of a scheme to push expensive medicines on to patients. But can the State prove that the medicine was even unsafe? Can they disprove that someone else entirely may have forged the doctor’s signature that killed a man?

State v. de la Porta and Cameron

A helicopter lands on the top floor of the tallest skyscraper in the state on Halloween night. Armed assailants break into the building and disrupt a charity auction for priceless artwork, stealing a fortune. Two people face criminal charges: billionaire Berkley de la Porta who organized the gala, and college student Poe Cameron. The billionaire has the stolen artwork hanging in their mansion and the college student was allegedly seen preparing for the heist. But potentially investigators rushed to conclusions and overlooked other suspects. Perhaps the college student did it, but was forced and under duress.

Skye v. Gold
    Ten years ago, Robin Skye stood accused of murdering their spouse in a criminal trial. Though nobody today disputes that Skye is innocent, that previous jury handed down a guilty verdict anyway, and Skye goes to prison. Skye’s attorney, Aubrey Gold, was a novice to murder cases, chose not to call any witnesses, and did not deliver a closing argument. Now ten years later, Skye is a free citizen after the conviction was overturned and tables have turned. Skye sues Gold for legal malpractice. Now it’s Gold’s turn to explain how the choices they made were reasonable and whether presenting a case would have hurt Skye more than helped.
Felder v. Koller Campbell Air, LLC

Aspiring ace pilot Reese Campbell takes his legal associate Morgan Felder on a test flight for the former’s new aerial tour company, Koller Campbell Air. Following a change in weather conditions, the novice Cambell deviates from his path and crashes the company plane into a mountain, killing both passengers. Felder’s spouse sues the tour company for negligence, while defendant and sole aerial tour company owner Casey Koller argues one of a number of intervening, superseding factors such as fireworks, engine failure, Cambell’s incapacitation, or the passenger’s assumption of risk.

State of Midlands v. Skyler Sinclair
    “Mickey Keenan,” an undercover officer for the Midlands State Police Department, was known for blowing open some of the Department’s biggest cases. On March 18, 2016, the Blitz News Network exposed “Keenan’s” identity—Jamie Robinson. Hours later, Robinson was dead. One of the suspects in Robinson’s final investigation is now on trial for Robinson’s murder.
Midlands Television Studios v. Danny Kosack
    • On June 29, 2017, Defendant Danny Kosack was scheduled to appear on a highly-rated talk show with Elias, Kosack’s chimpanzee. But a rehearsal before the show went terribly wrong when Elias attacked the people in the room. Plaintiff’s writer, Chris Villafana, was killed during the attack, and Plaintiff and Defendant have sued each other for negligence.
State of Midlands v. Tyler Perry
    On Friday, October 22, 2004, after returning home from a night out with the soccer team, Bailey Reynolds was kidnapped from the Reynolds home. That evening Bailey’s parents, Ryan and Madison Reynolds, were having dinner at the residence of Tyler and K.C. Perry. The couples both live in Evanston, Midlands. They had left their three children, Kayla, Spencer, and Bailey, with the babysitter, Peyton Bralow. After checking on Bailey around 11:00 p.m., Peyton placed a 911 call to report a possible kidnapping. The police arrived shortly after the call was placed and found Peyton, Kayla, and Spencer in the home. Upon investigation, a ransom note was found in Bailey’s room asking for $250,000 for the return of the child. Three days later on Monday, October 25, Bailey was found in a Hampton Hotel in the neighboring town of Freeport. The child was blindfolded and handcuffed to a pipe in the bathroom. Bailey was not physically injured and was returned to the Reynolds. After the police investigation, Tyler Perry was arrested for the kidnapping.
United States v. Parker Barrow
    • On October 31, 2017, two masked individuals entered Third National Bank in Midlands City and robbed the bank at gunpoint.  Police apprehended both, and both pled guilty.  On April 20, 2018, Parker Barrow, the bank teller, stands trial for armed bank robbery and conspiracy.

 

Elizabeth Ginger v. Max Heisman
    • On March 17, 2015, the city of Truman, Midlands held its mayoral election. That night, the media reported that incumbent Max Heisman defeated challenger Elizabeth Ginger, and the city tabulation director certified the result the next day. On March 20, Ginger filed a civil lawsuit against Heisman that alleges election fraud and seeks to overturn the election. An expedited trial is scheduled to begin April 17, 2015. Both parties have requested a jury trial.

 

Constitution and Bylaws

Find the University of Chicago Mock Trial’s Constitution and Bylaws here.