Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change workshop, this Friday, April 19 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301.

Up north there eh?: Fieldwork, variation and explaining (socio)linguistic patterns
Sali A. Tagliamonte, University of Toronto

In this talk, I will offer insights from the Ontario Dialects Project, which has been documenting ways of speaking in Ontario, Canada for over nearly 20 years from the largest city, Toronto, to many different types of communities the wilds of the Near North (e.g., Tagliamonte, 2013; 2014a). In addition to the intrinsic contribution of dialect preservation and documentation, this research provides explicit evidence for language innovation and obsolescence, contact, koinéization, dialect levelling and even has significance outside of linguistics (history, cultural studies, contemporary literature). By reviewing the practicalities, procedures and products of sociolinguistic fieldwork (Tagliamonte, 2007), I hope to show how community-based research can lead to new insights into social and linguistic patterns and thereby more integrated explanations. It can also lead to rich and accessible linguistic materials that are not only of use to linguists but also to the broader population, where there is an abiding interest in language puzzles, whether ancient codes or modern innovations.

Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2007). Representing real language: Consistency, trade-offs and thinking ahead! In Beal, J., Corrigan, K. & Moisl, H. (eds.), Using unconventional digital language corpora: Volume 1 Synchronic corpora. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 205-240.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2013). Roots of English: Exploring the history of dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2014a). System and society in the evolution of change: The view from Canada. In Green, E. & Meyer, C. (eds.), Variability in Current World Englishes. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change workshop, next Friday, April 12 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. Please see below for our other talks this quarter.

Minor languages of Balochistan & Sindh, with special reference to the Brahui language and its phonetics and phonology
Saeed Ahmed Lehri, University of Balochistan
Friday, April 12 @ 3:30pm in Rosenwald 301

In this presentation, I will introduce the minor languages of Balochistan and Sindh provinces of Pakistan. However, I will mainly discuss my mother tongue: Brahui, which is an endangered non-Indo-European language. I will give an overview of the characteristics of Brahui (vocabulary, orthography, sounds and sound change, inflection, word order, dialects). My main focus is sounds and sound change. I will also talk briefly about inflection, the plural morpheme, morphophonemic changes, and the formation of adjectives from nouns. Additionally, I will discuss word order, question formation, articles, and postpositions. In connection with sound change, I will describe elision and assimilation. I will also talk about weak and strong forms of pronunciation. Further, I will discuss stress and intonation patterns and rhythm (loudness, length, speeding up, slowing down and silence). I will also discuss how Brahui speakers are themselves contributing to the endangerment of their native language and what can be done to reverse this.

Week 3 (4/19): Sali Tagliamonte (Toronto)
Week 4 (4/26): Marlyse Baptista (Michigan)
Week 5 (5/3): Hannah McElgunn (UChicago)
Week 6 (5/10): no meeting
Week 7 (5/17): CLS 55
Week 8 (5/24): Daniel Lam (UChicago)

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change workshop, next Thursday, April 11 at 4:30pm, in Haskell 101. A reception will follow.

Introducing Mayan from Cunén: Constructing an ethnography from the inside out
Perry Wong, UChicago

Summary: I provide an introduction to the focal site for this study: Cunén, El Quiché, Guatemala. The lead question I develop in this chapter is: If distinct “Mayan languages” and “ethnolinguistic communities” are ideas only recently brought in from the outside, what are the methods and topics for a more realistic project of “language” documentation and description? Borrowing a critical device from a recent Americanist historiographic ethnography (Palmié 2013), I differentially build my own authorial position through a series of illustrated considerations of how not to study “Mayan in Cunén.” The purpose of this critical stance is heuristic and constructive. By revising more familiar “outside in” research perspectives as I introduce them, I begin to chart a complementary movement, from the discursive “inside out.” I offer and exemplify five such framings:

A. While not about “a language” and its diachrony, this study is about changing ideas about “language;”
B. While not a history of a distinct local population, this study is about discursive horizons of societal transformation;
C. While not about distinct “ethnolinguistic communities,” this study is about ongoing dynamics of aggregate migration, settlement, and segregation;
D. While not about synchronic “languages in contact,” this study is about real histories of encounter and (diplomatic) negotiation between people in contact.
E. While not about “a local (language) community,” this study is about the political issues and more general circumstances that have motivated particular people to organize and present themselves as collectivities (or not);

In the process of setting the critical narrative scene for later thematically-organized chapters, I model the ethnographic approach to reporting on the real social life of local discourse that I have adopted. I end with a brief description of logistics and planning in the periodic travel to Cunén that informs this study.

This is a joint meeting with the Semiotics: Culture in Context workshop. For a copy of the paper, please e-mail Rachel Howard (rhoward3@uchicago) or Grigory Gorbun (ggorbun@uchicago).

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change workshop, this Friday, March 1 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. This workshop coincides with our prospective student visit. A reception will follow.

Who owns the local sound change?
Sharese King, UChicago

Recent work has illustrated considerable regional variation across and within African Americans’ speech communities (Yaeger Dror & Thomas 2010; Wolfram 2007, 2015; Wolfram & Kohn 2015). Observations of regional diversity have come by way of analyses assessing African Americans’ participation in regional sound changes, but these analyses have tended to focus on southern and northern communities. Studies of vocalic variation in western African American communities, especially non-urban areas, remain relatively scant.

This paper examines the vocalic behavior of African Americans in Bakersfield, California, an inland community located south of the state, outside of Los Angeles. The African American community in Bakersfield is much less dense and centralized than the communities found in larger urban areas, with African American Bakersfieldians being dispersed throughout a wider community that is predominantly White. Given that these individuals are situated in a regional context in which the California Vowel Shift (CVS) is exhibited (D’Onofrio 2015; Eckert 2008; Hagiwara 1997; Kennedy & Grama 2012; Podesva et al. 2015), this study investigates the effects of the CVS on the regional variety of African American English (AAE) by focusing on the production vowels with distinct patterns in the CVS and the African American Vowel Shift (Thomas 2007): BAT lowering and retraction, BOOT-, TOO-, and POOL-fronting; and the overlap of LOT–THOUGHT.

The data come from sociolinguistic interviews with 12 Black Bakersfieldians (6 men, 6 women), and 18 White Bakersfieldians (9 women, 9 men). Interviews were transcribed and force-aligned using FAVE aligner, and formant measurements for each vowel token were extracted via Praat script. The results show that while African Americans have taken up some regional patterns (BAT lowering & retraction; BOOT-, TOO-, POOL-fronting), they have rejected others (LOT–THOUGHT merger). Taken together, this suggests that African American Bakersfieldians’ construction of identities can draw on locally-available linguistic resources, prompting us to reconsider the ways in which we define who are users of local sound changes and how the local context gives rise to particular patterns of production among this community of speakers.

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change Workshop, this Friday, February 15 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. A light reception will follow.

Patterns and parallels in Greek orthography of Egyptian names in Late Antiquity
Ella Karev, UChicago

The fifty-two Greek texts in the corpus of papyri from Elephantine are an invaluable source of information for the Late Antique community of the 3rd to the 7th centuries CE. In the publication of the Greek texts by Joel Farber in Bezalel Porten’s comprehensive The Elephantine Papyri in English (1996), the texts are accompanied by a prosopography containing 152 unique names. Of these, 81 (53%) are of discernibly Egyptian origin. Some of these names have known Egyptian antecedents from bilingual documents. However, for those names which do not appear in bilingual documents no reconstruction has been attempted. Despite extensive discussion regarding Greek orthography in general in papyri, Greek orthography of specifically Egyptian names, though touched upon in the 1970s, has since been largely laid by the wayside. Our understanding of Greek orthography of Egyptian names is in desperate need of updating, especially with the advent of databases such as trismegistos, which allow for more accurate analysis of existing documents. This paper employs names with known antecedents in order to set forth the patterns and parallels used in Greek orthography of Egyptian names in the Elephantine corpus. This pattern-mapping will then be used to build a series of orthographical conventions relevant to the corpus. Finally, this paper will make use of those conventions to suggest antecedents for a number of Egyptian names in the corpus with no known antecedents.

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change Workshop, this Friday, February 8 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. Following the talk, please join us for the fieldworkers’ social at the Pub.

Social context and lexical structure in homesign systems
Laura Horton, UChicago

In this talk, I will present an analysis of the relationship between social context and structure in homesign systems. Homesign systems are gestural systems for communicating, created by deaf children and adults who do not have access to a standard sign language and are unable to access the spoken language in their communicative environment as sources of linguistic input. For my dissertation, I collected data from nine child homesigners, four adult homesigners, and some of their hearing friends and family members. All of the participants (N=19) in this study live in or near the town of Nebaj, Guatemala where there is no standard sign language in use.

I analyze signs produced in a lexical elicitation task using two computational measures: a jaccard similarity index – to evaluate formal/semantic overlap in signs produced by signers in contact and signers who have never interacted with each other – and a measure I call “lexical richness” – which captures the distribution of form/meanings in each homesigner’s lexicon. I find that certain patterns of interaction are associated with higher jaccard similarity scores and that homesigners with similar social networks have similar lexical richness scores.

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change Workshop, this Friday, February 1 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. A light reception will follow.

Properties of para-phonemic sounds: Clicks in American English
Betsy Pillion, UChicago

Clicks in English are known to occur in transitional periods of talk, during word searches and as indicators of speaker affect. Less well established are the phonetic properties of these clicks, phonetic variation with respect to the click’s discourse role, and phonetic variation between speakers. This study contributes to understandings of click acoustics by examining clicks used within the Buckeye Corpus (Pitt et al. 2007) of American English.

Percussive clicks varied significantly in intensity from those with a discourse role such as conveying affect or turn-management. Speakers also varied in the extent to which clicks of all discourse types were employed: male speakers clicked percussively at a significantly higher rate than female speakers, whereas female speakers were more likely to use turn-management and affect-conveying clicks. This research helps illuminate an understudied aspect of sound systems, and gives insight into the extent of intra- and inter-speaker variation in non-phonemic sounds.

Please join us for a meeting of the Language Variation & Change Workshop, this Friday, January 25 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. A light reception will follow.

Motivating ‘exceptional’ animates in Ojibwe: the link between gender and classifiers
Cherry Meyer, UChicago

The Algonquian language of Ojibwe has both a gender system and a classifier system. The gender system has semantic, rather than formal, assignment of nouns to gender values. With two values of ANIMATE and INANIMATE, semantic assignment is rather straightforward. Nouns denoting humans and animals are ANIMATE, while most nouns denoting inanimates are INANIMATE. However, some nouns denoting inanimates are ANIMATE, e.g. asin ‘a stone’ or miskomin ‘raspberry’. I propose an analysis of gender assignment in Ojibwe that draws on the semantics of the sortal classifier system to motivate these apparently ‘exceptional’ nouns. I also discuss some complicating factors, such as the use of the gender values to effect a functional contrast.

Please join us for this quarter’s first meeting of the Language Variation & Change Workshop, this Friday, January 18 at 3:30pm, in Rosenwald 301. A light reception will follow.

On object shift, ergativity, and microvariation in Inuit
Michelle Yuan, UChicago

This talk investigates variation in the ergative system of the Inuit dialect continuum, for which the ergative pattern has been observed to be weaker in certain dialects than in others. I argue that the status of ergativity is systematically connected to another, seemingly independent point of variation: variation in object shift, i.e. whether the object raising to a structurally high position is a full DP or a pronoun (cf. Woolford 2017).

Evidence for this approach comes from novel fieldwork on the Eastern Canadian dialect group of Inuktitut—which, as I show, displays a number of previously unnoticed properties that make this correlation especially clear. From this, I present a novel analysis of ergativity across Inuit that reduces this correlation to variation in case competition for dependent ERG case assignment (Marantz 1991, Baker 2015). This captures the generalization that ergativity is intrinsically tied to the properties of the object, but more strikingly posits that ergativity need not directly reference any structural properties of the ERG case-bearing subject. More broadly, this talk offers a case study on how microvariation may be used as a lens into syntactic theory, and vice versa, by treating the Inuit languages as minimally-differing points along an otherwise gradient system.

Please also feel free to join us for any of our other talks this quarter.

Week 3 (1/25): Cherry Meyer (UChicago)
Week 4 (2/1): Elizabeth Pillion (UChicago)
Week 5 (2/8): Laura Horton (UChicago) + fieldworkers’ social at the Pub
Week 6 (2/15): Ella Karev (UChicago)
Week 8 (3/1): Sharese King (UChicago)
Week 9 (3/8): Maria Polinsky (Maryland)