Owen Joyce-Coughlan, What Might it Mean for a Thinker to be Systematic? The Case of Meister Eckhart

Owen Joyce-Coughlan

PhD Candidate, Theology, UChicago Divinity School

Respondent: John Marvin
 
PhD Student, Philosophy of Religions (Divinity) & Philosophy, UChicago
What Might it Mean for a Thinker to be Systematic? The Case of Meister Eckhart
TUESDAY, November 14th, 4:30 PM, Swift 207
 
This workshop will focus on a pre-circulated paper, which can be accessed here (please contact us for password), and the event will be largely discussion-based. We hope to see you there!

Abstract: 

It is generally agreed that Meister Eckhart was an original thinker, and that, with a striking variety of expression in both Latin and the vernacular, he enjoined a certain form of life to his readers and listeners.

Eckhart’s appeals are grounded in his view that it was possible ‘in this life’, so to speak, for his readers and listeners to achieve some form of union with the divinity. Eckhart repeatedly insists that we must live out of a recognition that every created thing is so inferior in comparison to God that it is best considered “nothing” in itself. To live in such a way will be to follow the course of “detachment” (abegescheidenheit), where we give up everything that binds us to the created order of things, and we will become one with God.

Beyond his teaching something like this very minimal set of facts and value judgements, however, it has proven difficult for scholarship on Eckhart to agree on his ideas about even those themes to which he most devoted his attention. Among points of controversy are, for instance: whether it is proper or desirable to say that ‘God is’ or is ‘good’; in virtue of what in the human soul is union with God possible; whether union with God is produced through his own grace or through our compelling God to unite with us; and many other issues of equally fundamental importance to Eckhart’s work, as well as to first philosophy and Christian theological doctrine.

The reason for this scholarly disagreement, I claim, is that Eckhart is profoundly inconsistent on such matters of primary philosophical and theological significance. This paper will, due to limitations of space, explore just one particular site of inconsistent statements on Eckhart’s part, in order to make the case that the fact that many of Eckhart’s writings are contradictory is not at all detrimental to his purposes. Indeed, a study of that very contradictoriness can guide us in understanding what his purposes actually were, what the philosophical virtues of his methodology in pursuing those purposes are, and how his work can and ought to be considered ‘systematic’.

Hosted by the Philosophy of Religions Workshop at the University of Chicago.

 

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop. Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu) or Taryn Sue (tarynsue@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.

Apocalyptic Phenomenology: On the Lucid Nihilism of Jean Vioulac

Matthew Peterson

PhD Candidate, Divinity School

Apocalyptic Phenomenology: On the Lucid Nihilism of Jean Vioulac

TUESDAY, October 31st, 4:30 PM, on Zoom
 

Please read as much as possible of Matthew’s paper in preparation to engage in discussion and Q&A (see PDF). Please contact us for the password. We hope to see you there!

Abstract:  

This article assesses the politics of the critical phenomenology of religion in contemporary France through a reading of the work of Jean Vioulac. Given that it has been nearly thirty years since the so-called theological turn in French phenomenology, the return to such a nexus could appear at best nostalgic, and at worst regressive. As I argue, however, Vioulac’s concept of apocalypse revitalizes the phenomenological epochē, the critical stance that suspends our everyday way of looking at things. By bracketing the world ordered by the “totalitarian logic” of Greek metaphysics, apocalypse accounts for a negativity that had been suppressed by philosophy. I first show how this perspective is mobilized by way of a materialist phenomenology of technology. I then unpack the ambiguity of an “apocalypse of truth” as both a philosophy of the concept and a philosophy of experience. On the basis of this project, I characterize Vioulac as a communist Cathar for whom the philosophy of religion consists in the archeological demystification of theological concepts. Finally, I consider the ways in which his method of “anarcheology” extends—but also risks reneging on—the insights of Foucauldian genealogy and Derridean deconstruction. On my reading, Vioulac’s project reminds us that philosophy wards off its dogmatic tendencies not by doing away with religion but by critically appropriating it.

Hosted by the Philosophy of Religions Workshop at the University of Chicago.

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop. Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu) or Taryn Sue (tarynsue@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.

Lucas Depierre, Falling from Nietzsche: Emil Cioran on Time and Eternity

Lucas Depierre

PhD Student, UChicago Divinity School

Respondent: Owen Joyce-Coughlan
 
PhD Candidate, Theology, UChicago Divinity School
 
Falling from Nietzsche: Emil Cioran on Time and Eternity
TUESDAY, October 24th, 4:30 PM, Swift 207
 
The workshop will consist of a 40-min presentation, followed by a response by Owen Joyce-Coughlan. Please read the short selection from Cioran’s writings (attached) for an introduction to his reflections on temporality.

Abstract: 

This presentation endeavors to excavate Cioran’s metaphysics of time as emerging from a critique of Nietzsche’s doctrine(s) of eternal return. Thereby, I argue against reducing Cioran to a self-contradictory and destructive thinker with stylistic qualities but on the margins of philosophical debates, particularly those on the question of time. To retrieve Cioran’s understanding of time, my innovative method is to assemble his disordered aphorisms under the light of Nietzsche’s angle in order to unearth Cioran’s intimate spiritual journey on the question of time. I conclude that if Cioran’s coherence has eluded scholarly investigation it is because his identified stance is intricately intertwined with his secretive and agnostic theological quest. I introduce and advocate for a “wandering paradigm” on Cioran’s metaphysics in order to deconstruct what I refer to as the “sedentary paradigm” derived from the nihilist and the Nietzschean interpretation. 

Keywords: Time, Cioran, Nietzsche, eternal return, fall from time, eternity, mourning.

The presenter would like to insist on a warning in order to not make any participant uncomfortable. This presentation will deal with topics such as suicide and depression. Some reflections and quotes from the author are provocative and particularly dark.

Hosted by the Philosophy of Religions Workshop at the University of Chicago.

 

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop. Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu) or Taryn Sue (tarynsue@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.

Joseph Haydt, Violence and the Moral Interpretation of Religion in Lessing’s Nathan the Wise

Joseph Haydt

Divinity School Teaching Fellow, UChicago
 
Violence and the Moral Interpretation of Religion in Lessing’s Nathan the Wise
The workshop will consist of a 30-min presentation from Joe, after which he will lead a discussion. Please read Act 3, Scenes 5–7 of Nathan the Wise (p. 77–86 in the attached pdf) in advance. We hope to see you there!

TUESDAY, October 17th, 4:30 PM, Swift 207

Hosted by the Philosophy of Religions Workshop at the University of Chicago.

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop. Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu) or Taryn Sue (tarynsue@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.

Angela Vettikkal, Nāgārjuna against Action

Angela Vettikkal

PhD Student, Philosophy, Yale University

Nāgārjuna against Action 
The workshop will consist of a presentation from Angela, after which she will lead a discussion. There is no need to read anything in advance. We hope to see you there!

FRIDAY, May 19th, NOON, Kitagawa Library in the Martin Marty Center, Swift Hall

Hosted by the Philosophy of Religions Workshop at the University of Chicago.

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop.  Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu), Audrey Guilbault (audreyrg@uchicago.edu), or John Marvin (johnmarvin@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.

Audrey Guilbault, Practical Truth and Practical Knowledge in Chinese Buddhist Philosophy

Dear colleagues,

We are excited to announce our next Philosophy of Religions workshop. Audrey Guilbault, Ph.D. student in the Divinity School and the Department of Philosophy, will be joining us to present an in-progress paper, “Practical Truth and Practical Knowledge in Chinese Buddhist Philosophy”.

The talk will be held in Swift 403 at 12:30pm this Friday, May 5th. The workshop will be a presentation and discussion of Audrey’s draft, and anyone interested is warmly invited to participate!

Warmly,

Danica, John, and Audrey

 

_____________

The Workshop on the Philosophy of Religions is committed to being a fully accessible and inclusive workshop.  Please contact Workshop Coordinators Danica Cao (ddcao@uchicago.edu), Audrey Guilbault (audreyrg@uchicago.edu), or John Marvin (johnmarvin@uchicago.edu) in order to make any arrangements necessary to facilitate your participation in workshop events.